Tuesday, January 28, 2020

Public Employee Collective Bargaining Legislation January 28, 2020


HB582 was considered by the House Labor and Commerce Committee this afternoon.  The committee adopted a comprehensive substitute.  The substitute would require public bodies, including school boards, to engage in collective bargaining with employee organizations.  The bill also requires that these collective bargaining agreements include, among other things, grievance procedures that provide for final and binding arbitration.  

VSBA has Legislative Position, 4.3, to oppose any legislation which would permit or expand the authority of any school board to engage in collective bargaining.  Click here it access the VSBA Legislative Positions.  

Based on Legislative Position 4.3, VSBA opposes HB582.  Rationale for our opposition is included below.  

·       Any legislation that requires school boards to enter into collective bargaining agreements that include binding arbitration is unconstitutional
o   No Virginia school board can agree to be subject to binding arbitration and, short of a constitutional amendment, the General Assembly cannot mandate such agreements.  See School Board for the City of Richmond v. Parham, 218 Va. 950 (1978) (“We conclude, therefore, that the binding arbitration provision of the Procedure produces an unlawful delegation of power, violative of § 7 of Article VIII of the Constitution.”)
·       Because school boards do not have taxing authority, they are not in a position to bargain with teachers’ unions with regard to salary or any other terms with a local cost. 
o   School boards are prohibited by law from entering into any contract to expend funds beyond what has been appropriated for the current fiscal year.  See Va. Code § 22.1-91.
·       The national trend in the last decade has been to move away from collective bargaining rights for teachers and towards focusing on student achievement instead.
o   Indeed, the vast majority of teacher collective bargaining laws were adopted between 1959 and 1987 and only one state (New Mexico), has adopted a duty-to-bargain law for public education since 1987.
o   On the other hand, many states including Wisconsin, Indiana, Idaho, Tennessee, and Michigan, have adopted legislation in the last decade to reduce teacher’s rights to collectively bargain.  
Collective bargaining can be used to increase protections for ineffective teachers.  VSBA believes that effective teachers are essential to providing a high-quality education to every student, in every school.